Why must one turn either the creation of art or the appreciation of art into a rigorous philosophical discipline? After all, isn’t art simply a
luxurythat we appreciate in our spare time for amusement? And if art has a practical function, isn’t it merely to develop our
moralfaculties through the imaginative practice of putting ourselves in another’s place? Also, with respect to the continuous debates about good and bad art, doesn’t the appreciation of art simply boil down to an issue of
tasteanyway? When compared to reality, isn’t art simply a
deceptivefacsimile of it? Lastly, doesn’t art, since it springs forth from the imaginative capacities of the mind,
resistany attempt to codify its rules scientifically or philosophically?
G. W. F. Hegel, in his Lectures on
4722 words
Citation: Sola, Andrew. "Vorlesungen über die Aesthetik". The Literary Encyclopedia. First published 05 April 2012 [https://www.litencyc.com/php/sworks.php?rec=true&UID=8654, accessed 31 March 2025.]